In
the Shadow of the Moon is about a uniformed police officer named Tom “Locke”
Lockhart. He responds to a rather
unusual death wherein the victim hemorrhaged blood and has an unusual mark on
the back of their neck. There are three
other similar deaths around Philadelphia, leading Locke to think they’re
connected.
Lo
and behold, they find the woman who committed.
The bad news is that she meets the front end of a subway train and
dies. On the same day, his wife gives
birth to their daughter, Amy. Unfortunately,
mother dies during childbirth, leaving Locke to raise Amy alone.
Cut
to Amy’s ninth birthday. Locke is
supposed to take her to the zoo, but gets interrupted by several other murders
similar to the ones on Amy’s birthday.
Locke is now a detective who has become obsessed with the case. There were no connections between the three
original victims and now he has several more.
It’s
not until nine years later (Amy’s 18th birthday) that Locke makes a
connection. He’s now a private detective
and still working on the case. He’s been
repeatedly told to let it go and move on with his life. The obsession has not only caused him to lose
his job, but Locke is now estranged from Amy.
It’s
not until nine years after this that it all falls into place for Locke. You’ll probably see many of the plot twists
coming. You may already have guessed a
few already.
The
movie moves very slowly. It’s almost
like it isn’t moving. It’s not that
there isn’t action. There is. It’s just that it’s very subdued. I came to realize that it was more drawn out
than anything. The running time is
almost two hours, which is maybe four to five times what it needs to be. Had this been a 20-30 minute production, it
would have been much better.
There
was a joke I heard once:
Q: What do you get when you play a country song
backwards?
A: You get your dog back, your job back and your
wife back.
There’s
a certain element of that here. Locke
loses everything in pursuit of answers.
You’d like to see him take a step back and maybe let it go. And the sad part is that he knows. It’s not like no one told him.
The
whole nine-year thing also bothered me.
It’s not really explained why time travel is tied to the moon or why
tying it to the moon produces nine-year intervals. I wouldn’t expect lunar cycles to match up
with a solar calendar like that.
This
seems like a very basic time-travel movie to me. It’s like someone tried to write it with very
minimal effort. There’s no worrying
about the effects of time travel or if the killer is screwing things up more by
doing this. There are no ripple
effects. It’s a very simple story that
doesn’t effectively use what it has. If
you’re going to make a feature-length film, at least put some effort into it.
No comments :
Post a Comment