It starts with a meteor innocently
hitting the ground somewhere in Arizona.
In fact, it lands on Wayne Grey’s car.
When college professor Harry Block hears about it, he heads out, taking
fellow professor Ira Kane with him. At
first, it’s innocent enough. A purple
goo oozes out of it, but wouldn’t seem to be anything significant. Life forms evolve from the goo. Within a few
days, multicellular organisms appear.
Within weeks, there’s a rainforest.
And, of course, the military gets
involved. They even bring along the
clumsy Dr. Allison Reed from the CDC.
The military takes Harry and Ira’s research and seal off the site. Eventually, the Army decides to use napalm on
the site to prevent the life forms from taking over North America. Because that’s what the Army does. When Harry tosses a match on a sample, he
realizes that the napalm would be a horrible idea. The napalm is used, which creates a giant
organism that Harry, Ira, Allison and Wayne have to take care of.
The movie isn’t really big on science. I’m not sure any of the writers even really
cared enough to look something up. The
reaction to fire is said to be survival of the fittest, but that’s not how it
works. Survival isn’t a reactionary
process. Throwing a match at a Petri
dish won’t force an evolutionary process any more than any other process.
Ira also deduces that selenium might be
harmful to the creatures just because of its position on the periodic table
relative to arsenic. That’s bad for
several reasons. First, there are carbon-based
life forms that can live on arsenic.
Second, the problems with arsenic tend to be long-term. Third, why would it be arsenic just because
of its position? That’s an awfully big
risk to take, considering that all life on Earth would seem to depend on
it. For that matter, how is life based
on nitrogen in the first place?
My biggest problem is that the
nitrogen-based life looks like the carbon-based stuff you’d find here. There’s no reason to this. Darwinian evolution proposes that life
evolves in response to its environment.
Those that are best suited survive.
Those that aren’t suited don’t make it.
There’s no reason to think that the nitrogen-based creatures would
evolve into anything that looked familiar.
I tend to see this as a lack of imagination. Yes, I know that the creatures are there to
pose a threat. There’s no reason to
think that they would spread quickly, either.
It’s just another way to put humans at risk.
I think the movie missed a really big
opportunity. As unrealistic as it is
that live would evolver so quickly, what would have happened had the life been
allowed to evolve at that rate? Within a
month, we had something looking like a primate.
That’s something that took billions of years on Earth. The meteor gave us life that did it in
weeks. What would that life have looked
like in another month? The real threat
would have come from a life form that would have greatly surpassed our own,
both physically and mentally.
IMDb page
No comments :
Post a Comment